Skip to main content

Government Borrowing & Commitment Fees

It has been mentioned that in the annual budget, national governments compute for the level of expenditures (farm to market roads, hospitals, schools, etc..) that will be needed to finance a growing population. To be able to finance the planned spending, ways on how to raise the needed money (taxes, tariffs, etc.), are included and put into action.

In instances when the projected income fails to equal the needed amount, governments have naturally resorted to borrowing (both domestic and foreign loans).

ON FOREIGN LOANS

In the past, the Philippine government borrowed a lot from institutions such as the IMF, WB & ADB, as well as ODA (Official Development Assistance) loans.

To date, debt servicing remains a big slice in the country’s national budget. Despite this, the country has a poor record in the actual usage of such loans due to delays in the implementation of the programs (which the loans were earmarked for). This naturally contributed to the failure of some sectors (in the economy) to receive the benefits of the delayed programs. What makes it worse is a little known fact that the government is slapped with Commitment Fees for the late availment of the loan funds. As of 2002, the commitment fees paid by the Philippine government to the ADB and WB has already reached US$40 Million. The amount (at present day costs) would be enough to feed 20,000 families for a year.

For a heavily indebted country, a wasted $40M (only for ADB & WB), is not funny at all. The figure for the two agencies must have reached a bigger number, by now. If we will compute the total figure for all the loan institutions, the end figure will surely be gigantic.

As of last Saturday, the government reports of instituting methods that will minimize, if not eliminate delays that will lead to the payment of commitment fees. The news simply means that the commitment fees still live on. So much for professional economists…

To be continued.....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

US PRESIDENTIAL CONVOYS

A columnist for a Philippine newspaper talks about the costs and massive preparations required by the US Secret Service whenever President Bush and other (US Presidents) travel outside of Washington DC. I remember watching a CNN report that showed how big a US presidential convoy is, compared to the two vehicle transport being used by Prime Minister Tony Blair of the UK.

Land Reform: Land of Bondage Land of the Free

One of the most moving speeches that I've read. During grade school, this was the most often recited elocution piece in my school. Here it is, the text of Raul Manglapus' Land of Bondage, Land of the Free. Land of Bondage, Land of the Free By Raul Manglapus And yet, ladies and gentlemen, the tao is constitutionally free! No wonder, then, that the tao being a slave has acquired the habits of a slave. No wonder that after three centuries in chains, without freedom, without hope, he should lose the erect and fearless posture of a freeman, and become the bent, misshapen, indolent, vicious, pitiful thing that he is! Who dares accuse him now? Who dares rise up in judgement against this man, reduced to this subhuman level by three centuries of oppession? Ladies and gentlemen the tao does not come here tonight to be judged -- but to judge! Hear then his accusation and his sentence: I indict the Spanish encomendero for inventing taxes impossible to pay! I indict the usurer for s

DOHA Round Updates & Preferential Tariffs in Practice

T he DOHA round of the World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations intends to promote the opening of markets and promoting free trade. This April, the latest meeting failed to reach a conclusion. Director-General Pascal Lamy of the World Trade Organization delivered a speech before the US Chamber of Commerce on April 23, 2007. Here are excerpts from his speech. "T oday we know that the Doha Development Round will not be concluded until and unless all these participants are ready to walk the extra mile and table additional contributions to the collective success of this multilateral enterprise. It is clear that the contributions will be linked to the degree of development and wealth of each participant, with the world poorest countries making the smallest contribution. It is also clear that no one will be asked to move first: countries will have to move in concert, like a big orchestra playing to the same tune. For the moment, a group of major actors — the EU, US, Brazil, India — d